This Horror Follow-Up <em>Influencers</em> Could Give Competing Digital Thrillers a Bad Case of FOMO
“Everything about this reeks of a cheap made-for-TV,” remarks a cynical commentator midway through the chilling follow-up Influencers. In the moment, his tone is manipulatively dismissive of a guest whose outlandish story he previously said he trusted. Yet his description of the events on screen isn’t wrong. Superficially, a pair of streaming movies chronicling a young woman who worms her way into the worlds of social media stars before killing them feels like a modern-day version of a lurid but network-approved weekly TV movie. The wild thing regarding Influencers is how much better it is compared to much of the competition, irrespective of screen size. It’s the kind of suspense film that should give its peers a serious bout of FOMO.
Revisiting the Original and Setting the Stage
2022’s Influencer follows the enigmatic CW (Cassandra Naud) while she quietly chooses solo-traveling social media targets, entices them to their deaths, and conceals those deaths (at least temporarily) by seizing control of their socials. The film concludes (spoiler ahead) with CW stranded on an uninhabited island near the coast of Thailand, after her most recent mark, Madison (Emily Tennant), turns the tables against her.
This lends 2025's Influencers some early mystery, as returning writer-director Kurtis David Harder resumes with the character CW contentedly residing with her girlfriend Diane (Lisa Delamar) in Paris. On a journey marking the couple’s first anniversary, British influencer Charlotte (Georgina Campbell) draws CW's attention and anger.
CW comments to her partner that someone should try stranding a phone-addicted influencer somewhere without any devices and see if they can survive. Are we witnessing a backstory prequel? Did CW become extremist by seeing the special treatment afforded one fame-seeker?
Evolving Viewpoints and Global Pursuits
The story’s perspective changes multiple times, eventually clarifying those introductory moments' chronological position. Harder catches up with Madison, now cleared of carrying out CW’s crimes, yet still encounters suspicion over her recounting of what happened, which includes the killing of Madison’s boyfriend. We also follow Jacob (Jonathan Whitesell), living in Bali and trying to boost his profile as half of a right-wing-influencer duo alongside Ariana (Veronica Long), though his chosen platform involves masculine-focused livestreams, rather than the Instagram photos that typically capture CW’s attention.
Naud remains immensely captivating in her role, a role that appears especially custom-fit for her talents. (She even created CW's striking wardrobe.) While the follow-up's focus leans heavily into CW — the first film seemed more balanced between the two women — it still works as a story of dueling investigators, with both women both use fabricated profiles, social media surveillance, and a seemingly limitless travel fund to pursue and/or escape each other. Of course, maybe the vast resources isn’t necessary. Online personalities possess a talent for getting to explore luxurious locales without paying much, a skill that CW echoes through her more blatant scamming.
Resourceful Production and Visual Wanderlust
The filmmakers behind Influencers appear equally ingenious in locating beautiful places to film, although they were presumably more legitimate in their methods. The vast majority of the movie seems to be filmed in real places, giving it a real-world weight that lingers even as numerous sequences involve a relatively small cast of people staring at computer or phone screens.
It follows the same logic which allowed the Bond franchise look so consistently opulent over the years: Yes, big action and visual effects can show off large spending, but just providing a travelogue of sorts for the audience also seems deeply filmic. This is particularly appropriate for a narrative so dependent on the coexisting surface-level allure and try-hard grind involved in producing envy-inducing digital content.
All of the characters visiting Bali, similar to those who were in Thailand in the first film, seem to have access to impossibly chic modern bungalows; there are movies concerning beach rescuers that don’t show off this much overhead swimming-pool footage. These individuals have to convincingly occupy these lush, remote places to emphasize the uneasy irony of how frequently each person — even the woman wreaking vengeance upon the online stars' self-centered phoniness — nevertheless spends plenty of time under the light of their devices.
Balanced Depictions and Tech-Savvy Tension
At the same time, Harder hasn’t authored a screed targeting the emptiness of online fame. While it is gratifying to watch CW exploit various online personalities, and a sense reminiscent of Hitchcock of alignment lets us to wish she doesn’t get caught, the filmmaker is somewhat sympathetic to the major influencer characters. Previously, he keyed into the loneliness Madison experienced during ostensibly envy-worthy vacations. In this film, the director appears confident that merely watching Jacob at work will reveal that he’s peddling false masculinity to other gullible men; he resists turning into a caricature the character. He even gives Jacob a degree of respect by showing his genuine loyalty to his partner; he’s a hypocrite, yet Ariana is a partner in his double standards, not someone exploited by it.
The flip side of Harder’s even-keeled presentation means it can sometimes appear that he’s nodding at elements of modern online life without deeply exploring them further. This is particularly evident regarding how he introduces artificial intelligence into the plot, a fascinating turn that lacks the psychosexual kick it deserves. The retitled sequel of Influencers could offer devotees of the original hope for an Aliens-style ante-upping, and the film ultimately delivers that, with a suitably wild final act. But before that, it resembles more a sleek Alfred Hitchcock movie than a frenzied, tech-addled De Palma-style shocker. Influencers’ heavy use of actual places might also be what keeps it from coming across like pure nightmare fuel. The world may be overrun with always-online creators, digital deception, and self-serving tourism, but reality itself is still here, for now.