🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to use a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that may create as many as five additional GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to set aside a district court's injunction that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and upsetting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its decision.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the new maps. It had mandated the state to use the districts created after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

In a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

The ruling is part of a countrywide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, boundary revision occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create several more Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees representation aligned with the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

On the other hand, Democratic officials decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top House figure argued the court had yet again shredded its credibility by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.